got hands on friend's external drive , testing transfer rate, 8 g or of files. should sequential read right? esata faster... think.
why transfer speend same approximately transfer fw800 external drive? because it's raid 1? , mirroring?
thanks!
it's because hitting limit of drive mechanism's transfer capability sooner seeing difference between esata , fw800.
raid 1 managed hardware controller in drive enclosure, or software raid? raid 1 have overhead.
also, can't compare transfer rates on 2 different hard drives. if 1 of them 90% empty, , other 90% full, full 1 might perform as 50% slower. not mention if there differences between mechanisms.
Forums Macs Mac Accessories
- iPhone
- Mac OS & System Software
- iPad
- Apple Watch
- Notebooks
- iTunes
- Apple ID
- iCloud
- Desktop Computers
- Apple Music
- Professional Applications
- iPod
- iWork
- Apple TV
- iLife
- Wireless
Comments
Post a Comment