Nikon D40x: Nikkor 70-300 VR or 55-200 VR?


i have nikon d40x, 18-55mm kit lens. lens, missing telephoto. have been using old 80-200mm dad, lack of auto-focus , vr makes not likeable me.

trying decide of these ones better. guess don't need focal length 70-300, have read has better optics , more sharp.

so, suggest?

also, nikkor 12-24mm f/4 , nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8? not planning on buying 1 of these right now, since expensive. maybe in near future i'll having 1 of these.

how noticeable image quality kit lens 17-35mm?

thanks,:)
 

i haven't had experiences 70-300mm vr, has received excellent reviews. own 55-200mm vr , iq excellent. real gripe vignetting @ long end.

you, think comes down whether use money saved getting 55-200mm vr , whether portability factor sinc 70-300mm vr fair bit heavier , larger 55-200. if neither of these big factors you, go 70-300 due longer range, better build, , iq said little bit better. don't me wrong though, 55-200mm incredible bargain , iq excellent. can have @ of photos @ link in sig... i'm still pretty new photography, can idea of capabilities of 55-200 vr.
 


Forums Special Interests Digital Photography


  • iPhone
  • Mac OS & System Software
  • iPad
  • Apple Watch
  • Notebooks
  • iTunes
  • Apple ID
  • iCloud
  • Desktop Computers
  • Apple Music
  • Professional Applications
  • iPod
  • iWork
  • Apple TV
  • iLife
  • Wireless

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mini-DVI to DVI-I?

How to best wire an entire house mac...(I want a touch screen in my bathroom)

New iMac here - LOVING the Mighty Mouse