i have nikon d40x, 18-55mm kit lens. lens, missing telephoto. have been using old 80-200mm dad, lack of auto-focus , vr makes not likeable me.
trying decide of these ones better. guess don't need focal length 70-300, have read has better optics , more sharp.
so, suggest?
also, nikkor 12-24mm f/4 , nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8? not planning on buying 1 of these right now, since expensive. maybe in near future i'll having 1 of these.
how noticeable image quality kit lens 17-35mm?
thanks,
i haven't had experiences 70-300mm vr, has received excellent reviews. own 55-200mm vr , iq excellent. real gripe vignetting @ long end.
you, think comes down whether use money saved getting 55-200mm vr , whether portability factor sinc 70-300mm vr fair bit heavier , larger 55-200. if neither of these big factors you, go 70-300 due longer range, better build, , iq said little bit better. don't me wrong though, 55-200mm incredible bargain , iq excellent. can have @ of photos @ link in sig... i'm still pretty new photography, can idea of capabilities of 55-200 vr.
Forums Special Interests Digital Photography
- iPhone
- Mac OS & System Software
- iPad
- Apple Watch
- Notebooks
- iTunes
- Apple ID
- iCloud
- Desktop Computers
- Apple Music
- Professional Applications
- iPod
- iWork
- Apple TV
- iLife
- Wireless
Comments
Post a Comment